Category Archives: Uncategorized

Steve Jobs…Job Well Done

After piling on yesterday with everyone else who felt that Apple blew it when they announced the new iPhone upgrade (not because of what they offered but because they let the rumors of what they might be offering…ie-a revolutionary re-think and re-design…get so far out of hand), I feel bad in retrospect, particularly after I hear today that Steve Jobs passed away today.

He, more than anyone else, epitimized the visionary new CEO we’ve come to expect.  The dreamer who could get it done.  Not only did he pioneer a whole new industry (personal computers) with his partner Steve Wozniak, but he proved that it wasn’t a fluke when he was brought back into the company he’d originally built and rescued it from the bean counters by bringing back passion and purpose again to their products.  And wonder….as in “I wonder what they’ll do next?”

That may come back to bite the company in the post-Jobs era, when a duller, drabber set of managers will try and continue to pull off that trick, again and again (as only Jobs could do it).  Let’s hope that there’s still some magicians within their ranks. For if they can’t create and control expectations (like they failed to do Monday when they rolled out the revised iPhone), then we’ll all be left to wonder “what if we never find another Steve Jobs again?”

“And one more thing…” as Jobs loved to say at the end of his presentation, as he pulled the rabbit once again out of his hat.  Just because someone shows you the trick, doesn’t mean you can really pull it off.  I think Apple’s new executives are just beginning to realize that.

Is This the New Apple?

Like everyone else, I was disappointed by the no news, “non-news” introduction of the “new iPhone 4S”.  They saw the hype happening and the anticipation of an entirely new, revolutionary platform.  So why didn’t they nip it in the bud?  Particularly with a new CEO taking the helm!

What I fear is this…Rather than still aspiring to be bold and “industry leading”,  the new Apple (under the bean counters again) is just trying to milk some more  profit out of the orignal chassis.  Then, next summer, they’ll make all  these iPhone 4S’s obsolete with their delayed iPhone 5.  Which explains  what the added letter “s” stands for…sucker.

Or will it turn out be “S for Stupid” in that Apple wasted a chance to get ahead of their competition and capture all those people who were ready to buy their product NOW (many of who may now go to Android rather than wait for the highly anticipated new platform the new Apple leadership allowed us to believe was coming).

A classic case of misreading the market and sending the wrong message (on mulitiple levels) to their disappointed fans and consumers.  From the one company we NEVER expected to get it wrong.

Read more: http://techland.time.com/2011/10/04/spec-spat-apple-iphone-4s-vs-iphone-4/#ixzz1ZqzAR8Rq

Is the PC Dying?

For years, people have speculated that Personal Computers will eventually die out and be replaced by simple, cheap “interface devides” that will allow you to log onto the Internet (where all your software and data resides).  That’s what Google is coming out with soon (a simple appliance to sign onto the Internet with almost no hard drive, no actual storage space and no programs to upload or update).

For some, HP’s sudden decision to stop making PCs and write-off the billions they paid to purchase Compaq and later Palm (to power their now dead tablets) signals the beginning of the end for PCs as we know them.  This article from BNET further explores that topic.

By Erik Sherman, BNET.

Does HP’s (HPQ) recent move to spin off its PC business underscore the end of the PC era? Not if you ask Microsoft (MSFT), or at least its vice president of corporate communications Frank Shaw. To Redmond, the PC is the hub of technical existence, with e-readers, tablets, set top boxes, and smartphones anything but PC-killers. Instead, Shaw argues on his corporate blog, PCs do a lot more and will remain vital and necessary in the future.

In one sense, he’s right. The PC isn’t going away completely, because there are important things it can do more easily than the other devices. But a PC-centric world? Oh, no, sorry, those days are done. Furthermore, if you look at Microsoft’s strategy, management already knows it. The company just doesn’t want to let on, because it would spook investors — and tank stock prices.

PCs will never die and cars are a fad

Shaw’s argument that we’re in a “PC plus” age came down to two basic points:

  1. There are a set of important things that PCs do uniquely well, and they aren’t going away.
  2. PCs are rapidly and dramatically getting better at doing the things those companions do.

He’s right on number 1 — for now — and irrelevant on 2. When it comes to creating material, the PC still rules because it has a bigger screen, which means more working real estate, and greater horsepower to do what you want. That said, at least one artist for the New Yorker has created a number of covers on an iPhone. No, not an iPad … an iPhone. You can also shoot images and video from small handheld devices and even do some basic editing.

A growing number of people can do what they need with mobile devices that are becoming better at what PCs do. Are PCs getting better at what the other devices do? Of course, because the basic capabilities of software improve. But are PCs getting much lighter and faster? Nowhere near enough for people to tote them around they way they might a smartphone, e-reader, or tablet.

Look at us!

Shaw took the official Microsoft corporate line that the PC is the center of the known universe. Only, that’s got things backwards. The product isn’t the center; the customer is. Microsoft has assumed that the PC and the consumer are the same, and that what’s good for the PC — which means what’s good for Windows and Office — is good for the consumer.

Utter nonsense, of course, because a business can’t win in the long run if it expects customers to play second fiddle. That’s why smartphones, tablets, e-readers, and the like are gaining success, because they are doing what people want and not expecting customers to do what the vendors want.

But then, Microsoft already knows that it’s in a post-PC-centric time. That’s why the company created the Xbox and keeps pushing the services available through it. The console is Microsoft admitting that its vision of home entertainment centered around a traditional PC wasn’t going to work. If PCs were really that important to everyone, why bother pushing so hard on the smartphone front? After all, the client business wouldn’t go away.

Investors don’t heart tech

But Microsoft is pushing on all other boundaries because it knows the PC center will not hold. From the company’s perspective mere anarchy is loosed upon the industry, and it stands a strong chance of losing its relevance.

What makes it so devilish is that for Microsoft to lose, PCs don’t have to disappear. Apple (AAPL) CEO Steve Jobs was right in saying that PCs would be like trucks: large, powerful, necessary for commerce, and not what most people need to drive the majority of the time.

That doesn’t mean extinct. But in the tech world, if you make trucks and not cars, you don’t get to help form what consumers will use, and so you also lose influence over what businesses do with their systems and how they make them work for customers.

However, many investors have undervalued technology companies and Microsoft has been high up on the list. Management knows how Wall Street could suddenly get buggy should anyone in Redmond admit that the PC has seen its heyday. Look at the 20 percent drop that HP (HPQ) stock took after the company announced last week that it looks to get out of the client PC business.

Why else would Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer claim that an iPad was just a “different form factor of PC?” Microsoft practically trips over its own corporate tongue to avoid admitting that the emperor has no clothes. And yet, it also tries, at the same time, to gain dominance in these new areas.

No wonder the company has such troubles, because it’s living in a land of cognitive dissonance. Maybe that explains part of its internal reluctance to push technologies that might challenge the dominance of the company’s historic juggernauts.